Skip to main content

 


PAKISTAN – IRAN LAND TRANSIT ROUTES. IS THIS THE END OF U.S. DOMINANCE IN THE MIDDLE EAST?

           On April 13, 2026, the online publication Intellinews Eurasia announced the opening of a terrestrial trade corridor between Pakistan and Central Asian states, via Iran[1]. On April 26, the media published the Pakistani government's announcement regarding the opening of six land transit routes between Pakistan and Iran for the delivery of Iran-bound goods from third countries, thereby bypassing the blockade imposed in the Gulf of Oman by the US Navy[2]. Could these routes be used by Iran for exports, thereby bypassing the blockade? We cannot know. Technically speaking, it is possible. Even if we strictly refer to goods destined for Iran transiting Pakistani territory, this fact can be considered assistance to this state and a defiance of the US. In fact, an American security expert has already flagged the issue to the President of the United States[3].

          It is important to know that Pakistan is (or perhaps was) a key US ally. The massive aid provided to insurgent movements in Afghanistan fighting against Soviet forces and the pro-Soviet government between 1980 and 1988 was delivered through Pakistan. The USSR's losses in that war, which contributed significantly to its economic degradation and, ultimately, to the dismantling of the state, were largely due to Pakistan. This was achieved not only by allowing the transit of weapons, military equipment, and insurgent fighters through its territory but also by establishing military camps for training the Afghan opposition, providing military bases to US intelligence services, gathering intelligence, and executing undercover operations in Afghanistan by Pakistani special services, among other activities. On the other hand, the US not only allowed but also provided consistent support to Pakistan in the production of nuclear weapons[4]. All of this demonstrates a close relationship between the two countries, rooted in strategic interests.

          Currently, the Pakistani government is helping Iran evade the US naval blockade. This may be of greater or lesser significance, but the act itself demonstrates that Pakistan is gradually distancing itself from its relationship with the US. Moreover, the Pakistanis are well aware of what is happening in the Middle East, what US forces have managed to achieve against Iran, the situation in Iran following the American-Israeli air campaign, and what the prospects are there. There is no other explanation than that Pakistan's action serves as a concrete indicator of the end of US dominance in the region.


[1] “Update: Pakistan launches Iran transit corridor with first shipment to Central Asia”, Intellinews Eurasia, accessed May 4, 2026, https://www.intellinews.com/update-pakistan-launches-iran-transit-corridor-with-first-shipment-to-central-asia-436946/.

[4] “U.S. and China Helped Pakistan Build Its Bomb”, The New York Times (online archive), accessed May 4, 2026, https://archive.nytimes.com/www.nytimes.com/library/world/asia/060198pakistan-nuke-history.html.


Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

  US INTERVENTION IN IRAN – A STRATEGIC TRAP?            I will begin with a straightforward question: what is the current state of affairs in Venezuela? Following the US-Israeli intervention in Iran, this Latin American nation has slipped off the geopolitical radar. Nonetheless, it remains a subject of interest .           Subsequent to the apprehension of the Venezuelan president on the night of January 2-3, 2026, by US special forces during a domestic military incursion, the United States has sustained its naval presence in the region to exert military pressure on the Venezuelan administration [1] . Despite Washington's recognition of the interim government, the continued deployment of significant military assets suggests that the primary objectives remain unfulfilled. Effectively, the state continues to be led by members of the previous regime. It is possible that they are now undergoing a strategic shif...
Post a Comment
Read more
  US INTERVENTION IN IRAN – HOW WILL IT END?           There is a heated debate in the media regarding how the current military conflict in the Gulf will end. It is naturally difficult to predict, as the US is at a deadlock. It has failed to achieve its objective (regime change in Iran); on the contrary, Iran's military retaliation has caused it major problems. The facts are well-known, so there is no need for further detail .           The US leadership has just announced a two-week suspension of military actions against Iran [1] . The real underlying motive is difficult to guess. Regardless, this move does not resolve the conflict; it merely provides a pause .           Let us try to identify and analyze the options for ending the hostilities. We proceed from the premise that it does not depend solely on the US-Israel camp, but also on Iran .     ...
Post a Comment
Read more
  THE MYTH OF ISRAELI INVINCIBILITY. PART II 1956 – Suez Crisis            Crisis erupted due to the nationalization of the Suez Canal. In 1954, the Egyptian president, Gamal Abdul Nasser, started ambitious projects, including Aswan Dam (on Nile) and armed forces modernization. Initially, he asked USA and UK for funding but was refused. Taking advantage of the rivalry between Eastern and Western blocs, he approached the USSR for help and received a positive answer. Based on Soviet security guarantees, he took a step forward: on 26 July 1956, he nationalized Suez Canal, owned by an Anglo-French company. Due to the highly geostrategic and economic importance of the canal, UK and France reacted. Their first approach, supported by the USA, was a diplomatic one but later, planned a military intervention to seize the canal by force. Israel was included in this plan. According to it, the Israeli forces were supposed to conduct offensive operations in Sinai Pe...
Post a Comment
Read more