Skip to main content

 


KHARG ISLAND – MISSION IMPOSSIBLE?

          The international media is flooded with information regarding the US leadership's intention to perform a military operation to occupy Kharg Island in the Persian Gulf. It is believed that seizing the island, which is Iran's primary oil hub, would deal a powerful blow to the Tehran regime. However, such an operation involves an assault and the occupation of the island by an expeditionary force. In other words, boots on the ground.[1]

          Kharg Island is located 483 km from the Strait of Hormuz and 25 km from the Iranian coast. The shortest distance to the Saudi coast is approximately 190 km, as is the distance to the Kuwaiti coast. The island's surface area is about 20 km².


            A simple consultation of the map and a minimal knowledge of the situation show us that there are two options (courses of action) for occupying the island: 1. An amphibious assault; 2. An airborne assault. These can be conducted by US Marines or airborne troops, possibly with the support of special forces.

        At this moment, the first course of action is impossible. Because the Strait of Hormuz is blocked for US Navy warships, and there are no prospects for unblocking it.

       The second course of action is possible, at least at first glance. From forward operating bases located in Kuwait and/or Saudi Arabia, American forces could execute an airborne assault using helicopters. The action would be preceded by heavy strikes on Iranian military infrastructure on the island and along the coast, carried out with missiles and aviation. Subsequently, the assault force, embarked on transport helicopters and Boeing V-22 Osprey aircraft, escorted by attack helicopters, would land on the island. However, the danger would be Iranian drones, which would jeopardize the transport helicopters. To counter them, a large number of attack helicopters would be necessary, because the assault force need around-the-clock air cover. In any case, losses are inevitable.

        Once the island is occupied, two problems would arise. The first is resupply, via helicopter support or airdrops from transport planes. This is solvable. However, I do not know to what extent the second problem could be resolved. The island would become the target of continuous bombardment by Iranian forces, using missiles and drones. There would be no warships at sea to provide anti-aircraft protection, and the Saudi and Kuwaiti coasts are too far away; the support units there would not be able to provide continuous protection. The island's small surface area does not allow for the efficient dispersal of troops. Essentially, the landing force would find itself in a shooting gallery, at the mercy of the Iranians. A total fiasco.




[1] "Trump eyes "Hormuz Coalition," seizure of Iran's Kharg Island oil hub", Axios, accessed March, 17, https://www.axios.com/2026/03/16/trump-iran-hormuz-strait-kharg-island.


Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

  THE MIDDLE EAST MILITARY CRISIS: A GREAT PARADOX Saudi Arabia is (still) one of the world's major economic powers. Thanks to oil, and not only. This is well known, and there is no need for further details. Like any highly developed state, its armed forces are structured to match. With 247,000 active-duty personnel and an additional 150,000 paramilitary forces (there are no reservists), 917 aircraft (including 283 fighter jets), 1,085 tanks, over 1,200 heavy artillery pieces, and 32 warships, backed by an annual budget of over 63 billion USD, the country can be considered a regional military power. In fact, in the ranking published by Global Firepower, it ranks 25th out of 145 nations. [1] The numbers speak for themselves. No explanations are needed. Let's look at a neighbor. The United Arab Emirates. 65,000 active-duty personnel, 130,000 reservists, and 12,000 in paramilitary formations, 581 aircraft (including 99 fighter jets), 354 tanks, 300 heavy artillery pieces, and 84 ...
Post a Comment
Read more
  US INTERVENTION IN IRAN – A STRATEGIC TRAP?            I will begin with a straightforward question: what is the current state of affairs in Venezuela? Following the US-Israeli intervention in Iran, this Latin American nation has slipped off the geopolitical radar. Nonetheless, it remains a subject of interest .           Subsequent to the apprehension of the Venezuelan president on the night of January 2-3, 2026, by US special forces during a domestic military incursion, the United States has sustained its naval presence in the region to exert military pressure on the Venezuelan administration [1] . Despite Washington's recognition of the interim government, the continued deployment of significant military assets suggests that the primary objectives remain unfulfilled. Effectively, the state continues to be led by members of the previous regime. It is possible that they are now undergoing a strategic shif...
Post a Comment
Read more
  IRAN: SUMMARY        We are not talking about history. We are talking about current events. We are witnessing the most profound changes since the early 1990s.           Let's make a brief effort of memory. Let's remember what was happening in Iran between January and February 2026. This year. Not much time has passed. At that time, the ayatollahs' regime was on its last legs. Everything was clear. The massive devaluation of the national currency, bankruptcies, crisis, protest demonstrations across the country, often violent, with significant destruction. The security forces were no longer capable of containing them. On the contrary, police officers were being killed in the streets and police stations were set on fire. Nothing could stop the process of change anymore. It was a natural consequence of years of economic sanctions and external pressures of all kinds. And the country's leaders were accused of mismanaging ...
Post a Comment
Read more