Skip to main content

 


KOSOVO – AN UNFINISHED WAR

- Book Presentation -


The presence, in media, of the news regarding the conflict between the two main Kosovo communities, Serbs and Albanians, as well as the evolution of the political conflict between Republic of Serbia and other international entities on Kosovo, demonstrates that this problem is still unsolved.

          The book does not concern the history of the conflict. It is a work in the military analysis field. The history part is necessary to understand the origins of the war and the reasons of the military campaign conducted by NATO in 1999 against Republic of Yugoslavia. The military analysis of the war has two main goals:

1.    To emphasize the significant issues of the military campaign, which, without few exceptions, have not been approached or have been little approached.

2.    To demonstrate that the conflict might not be finished yet. From the political point of view, this is well-known. Nevertheless, there might be some chances to transform the political conflict into a military one.

          The book begins with a short history of the conflict, for coherence and to create a general picture of the origins and the evolution of military events. Then, another chapter presents the military capabilities of the belligerents, in order to show the gap between them: international armed forces, possessing hi-tech equipment and huge resources, versus a much smaller force, possessing old and obsolete Soviet (and Soviet-based) equipment, as well as very few resources.  

          The history part of the book continues with a chronology of the military events, by collecting information from various sources and synthesizing them. Although this chronology does not include all the details, it is, nevertheless, a clear picture of the war performed by the NATO Air Force, Navy and Special Forces against Federal Republic of Yugoslavia for 78 days. The chronology was necessary, because I could not find any accurate description of military actions and it is not possible to study a military conflict without it.

          The history part ends with a chapter that presents the campaign assessments, where I provided different figures of armed forces involved, in terms of people and means, as well as damages on both sides.

          The military analysis of the armed conflict approaches certain subjects that I consider not enough, even superficial approached in the previous works regarding the Kosovo War. These are as the following:

- How many invisible planes were hit or downed?

- How efficient was the Yugoslav air defense?

- Is the old military equipment still useful in the modern armed conflict?

- How efficient is the military technology against armed forces which use old and obsolete military equipment?

- What did the NATO Special Forces do during the campaign?

- How many Yugoslav tanks were destroyed in Kosovo?

- Were the armed forces of the Republic of Albania involved?

- Was a ground offensive against Yugoslavia achievable?

- Did NATO leaders really wish to conduct a ground offensive?

- Which were the actions of the Russian Federation armed forces during the conflict and at the end of it?

          There are still false stories regarding some of the subjects above-mentioned. For instance, there are journalists (and not only journalists) still convinced that NATO air assets destroyed only 14 Yugoslav tanks in Kosovo. This problem is approached in a separate chapter. Another false story concerns the loss of an F-117 Stealth. Many believe that this was the only victory of the Yugoslav air defense. On contrary, more aircrafts were downed or damaged, but not as many as some sources claimed at the end of campaign or after that.

          By approaching the details using military analysis methods, based on the above mentioned questions, one can find interesting facts. A complex picture, full of interesting aspects, results. And these aspects could not be seen before, while studying the wide range of sources that provide information on the subjects. For instance, the loss of the invisible fighter, corroborated with the details of the air operations, offers many opportunities to search and to reach novel conclusions.  The book only tries to clarify some aspects, without pretending a high level of accuracy.

          The most important theme of the book starts from a question: the Allied Force campaign (air offensive conducted by NATO against Yugoslavia in 1999) put an end to the military conflict? In my opinion, there are two answers: one for short term, another one for long term. For the short term, the answer is YES, the bloodshed was stopped, the problems were solved, the humanitarian crisis ended. For long term, the evolution of the political conflict is full of uncertainties. One can state, by watching the TV news, that it is not ended. What will it happen? Are there still risks to degenerate into a military conflict? This book tries to give an answer.




Comments

Popular posts from this blog

  THE MYTH OF ISRAELI INVINCIBILITY. PART II 1956 – Suez Crisis            Crisis erupted due to the nationalization of the Suez Canal. In 1954, the Egyptian president, Gamal Abdul Nasser, started ambitious projects, including Aswan Dam (on Nile) and armed forces modernization. Initially, he asked USA and UK for funding but was refused. Taking advantage of the rivalry between Eastern and Western blocs, he approached the USSR for help and received a positive answer. Based on Soviet security guarantees, he took a step forward: on 26 July 1956, he nationalized Suez Canal, owned by an Anglo-French company. Due to the highly geostrategic and economic importance of the canal, UK and France reacted. Their first approach, supported by the USA, was a diplomatic one but later, planned a military intervention to seize the canal by force. Israel was included in this plan. According to it, the Israeli forces were supposed to conduct offensive operations in Sinai Pe...
  KHARG ISLAND – MISSION IMPOSSIBLE?           The international media is flooded with information regarding the US leadership's intention to perform a military operation to occupy Kharg Island in the Persian Gulf. It is believed that seizing the island, which is Iran's primary oil hub, would deal a powerful blow to the Tehran regime. However, such an operation involves an assault and the occupation of the island by an expeditionary force. In other words, boots on the ground . [1]           Kharg Island is located 483 km from the Strait of Hormuz and 25 km from the Iranian coast. The shortest distance to the Saudi coast is approximately 190 km, as is the distance to the Kuwaiti coast. The island's surface area is about 20 km² . Source: https://www.britannica.com/place/Kharg-Island             A simple consultation of the map and a minimal knowledge of the situation show us ...
  THE MYTH OF ISRAELI INVINCIBILITY. PART VI 1978 – Intervention in Lebanon              In 1973, after the Yom Kippur War, Israel already possessed clear military superiority over its Arab neighbors. The defeat suffered and the heavy losses within the Arab coalition guaranteed this reality. The superiority was reflected in the trump cards it consistently held or had regained: strong US support, highly effective intelligence services, air power, and the tactics of (blitzkrieg). Technological superiority was not yet evident.         Israel’s security was already very solid compared to the 1950s and 1960s. Peace negotiations were underway with Egypt. Jordan no longer posed a problem. Syria remained the only neighboring state enemy, but it was far from having the capacity to launch any military campaign against Israel. Other enemies still existed—namely Iraq and Libya—but they were not in a position to act directly. What remained ...