Skip to main content

 



THE DIVERSIONISTS

article published on 8 September 2020


         In 1944, on an unknown day, a secret briefing took place at Kremlin. The following leaders participated at that briefing: Stalin, the Soviet State leader, Vsevolod Merculov, State Security Commissar, Viktor Abakumov, Red Army Counterintelligence Directorate’ (SMERȘ[1]) chief, Fiodor Kuznețov, Main Intelligence Directorate of the Red Army’ (GRU[2]) chief and Pavel Soduplatov, the 4th Directorate of NKGB[3] – Reconnaissance and Sabotage’ chief. Their names suggest the importance of the briefing. The result of discussions was the decision to plan an important diversionary operation: Berezino.

          The operation began with a disinformation. A soviet officer, Aleksandr Demianov, which Abwehr[4] considered an important source (code name “Max”), but, in reality, under SMERȘ’ control (he became a “source” for Abwehr during a soviet secret services operation whose purpose was to infiltrate  spies in the German secret networks, in the beginning of the war;  the purpose was to misinform German Supreme HQ – operation Monastir), sent a radiogram to Berlin, on 18 August 1944, to inform about the following:

-       A great number of German military men remained behind enemy lines, who could be gathered in a regiment or even a higher formation, located in a forest near Berezino city, East  of Moghilev, Byelorussia;

-         Some of those German military men were wounded;

-       They intended to find a way to the German lines, but they did not have enough weapons;

-          The agent “Max” could keep in touch with them.

Abwehr’ answer to ”Max” was: “keep in touch with the isolated German soldiers and find out their location, in order to receive support and a radio operator”.

In order to continue the diversion, the Soviets recruited a German officer (prisoner of war) to play the role of the false military unit’s commander. At the same time, Soviet engineers built facilities in the forests of Berezino area. A special Soviet unit, whose members were equipped with German weapons and clothing, was established and deployed there.  

On 15 September, three German radio operators were dropped on a location indicated by agent ”Max”. They were captured and persuaded to collaborate. The operation was going on. Based on faked radiograms sent by the false unit, German forces dropped equipment and food. On 27 October, a doctor and an Air Force Officer were also dropped.  

Abwehr HQ tried to check the reliability of the reports received, by sending more reconnaissance teams in the area, without informing the supported unit. Those teams were not successful. They were all captured and convinced to collaborate, by sending radiograms made by the Soviets. The Germans continued to send supplies.

Between September 1944 and 30 April 1945, in order to support the false unit, German Forces conducted 67 air missions, dropped 25 agents (all were captured) and provided 13 radio sets and 644 boxes which contained: 615 winter battle dress suits, 20 machine-guns, 100 riffles and assault rifles, 35 pistols, 2.000 grenades, 142.000 cartridges, 2.5 tons of meet, 370 kilos of chocolate, 4 tons of breed, 400 kilos of sugar, 100 liters of wine and so on. They also sent money, in whole 2,258,330 rubles. All of these happened while Red Army was fighting on the German territory and Berlin was in danger! German higher echelons promoted and decorated the German officer “appointed” as the false units’ commander.

It seems that the most important achievement of the operation was the Abwehr-kommando 103 commander’s intention to join the false unit. Lieutenant-colonel Rudolf von Barenfeld was on the Soviet Forces’ top priority enemies list. Abwehr-kommando 103 was a Special Operations Forces unit tasked with performing intelligence collection and sabotage operations behind Soviet lines[5]. During an after-action review, the Soviets drew the conclusion that he was killed when the plane which transported him was hit by the Soviet flak.

On 1st of May 1945, the false German unit from Byelorussia received a last message from the Berlin HQ, according to the supplies deliveries became impossible, as well as the radio connection. The war was coming to an end. The diversionist operation in Byelorussia also came to an end.






[1] СМЕРШ - Специальные Методы Разоблaчения Шпионов (Spetzialnii Metodi Razoblocenia Shpionov); in English: Special Methods to Identify Spies; this special service was also known as Смерть шпионам (Smert Shpionam), in English: ,,Death to the Spies”.

[2] ГРУ - Гла́вное разве́дывательное управле́ние (Glavnoe Razvedivatelnoe Upravlenie); the whole name: ГРУ ГШ - Гла́вное разве́дывательное управле́ние Генера́льного Шта́ба (Glavnoe Razvedivatelnoe Upravlenie Gheneralnovo Shtaba); in English: Main Reconnaissance Directorate of the General Staff; the word  reconnaissance is used in Russian to specify  own intelligence structures; it does not mean only reconnaissance subunits and units, it also means strategic intelligence organizations; the word main is used in order to make a difference between the directorate of General Staff (General Shtaba) and other directorates of strategic HQs – fronts or military regions, also subordonated to the main directorate (GRU).

[3] НКГБ - Народный комиссариат государственной безопасности (Narodnîi Komisariat Gosudarsvenoi Bezopasnosti); in English: People’ Commissariat for State Security.

[4] German Army’s Intelligence Service.

[5] Deutsche Digitale Bibliothek, on Internet at https://www.deutsche-digitale-bibliothek.de/item/JOC3PNRIEFAYHCXOGZ6XPXJBUUIJTIAM, accessed on 27 Aug 2020.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

  US INTERVENTION IN IRAN – A STRATEGIC TRAP?            I will begin with a straightforward question: what is the current state of affairs in Venezuela? Following the US-Israeli intervention in Iran, this Latin American nation has slipped off the geopolitical radar. Nonetheless, it remains a subject of interest .           Subsequent to the apprehension of the Venezuelan president on the night of January 2-3, 2026, by US special forces during a domestic military incursion, the United States has sustained its naval presence in the region to exert military pressure on the Venezuelan administration [1] . Despite Washington's recognition of the interim government, the continued deployment of significant military assets suggests that the primary objectives remain unfulfilled. Effectively, the state continues to be led by members of the previous regime. It is possible that they are now undergoing a strategic shif...
IRAN, US, THE STRAIT OF HORMUZ. HOW WILL IT END?          On an online forum where geopolitics and military analysis are debated ( Moon of Alabama ), I read a comment that seemed very convincing to me. I will rephrase it slightly, but keep the essence: 'Iran does not need a nuclear weapon. It already has one: the Strait of Hormuz.' Perfectly true. Control of the strait has proven to be a powerful weapon in the hands of the Iranian leadership . The negotiations, or rather the attempts at negotiations between the US and Iran, have been ongoing since April 11. With no result. The US is trying to negotiate from a position of strength, but it lacks the necessary tools of force. Iran is also negotiating from a position of strength, but it has the strong argument: the nuclear weapon – the Strait of Hormuz. Of course, no agreement will be reached. The US cannot afford to give in, and Iran can afford to maintain the current status quo. The situation is like a fisherman w...
  US INTERVENTION IN IRAN – HOW WILL IT END?           There is a heated debate in the media regarding how the current military conflict in the Gulf will end. It is naturally difficult to predict, as the US is at a deadlock. It has failed to achieve its objective (regime change in Iran); on the contrary, Iran's military retaliation has caused it major problems. The facts are well-known, so there is no need for further detail .           The US leadership has just announced a two-week suspension of military actions against Iran [1] . The real underlying motive is difficult to guess. Regardless, this move does not resolve the conflict; it merely provides a pause .           Let us try to identify and analyze the options for ending the hostilities. We proceed from the premise that it does not depend solely on the US-Israel camp, but also on Iran .     ...