THE VULNERABILITIES OF
THE CHINESE NATIONAL SECURITY SYSTEM
Article published on 19
Dec 2020
The recent statements of the Chinese
Foreign Ministry spokesperson reveal tensions between China and the Five Eyes alliance – USA, United Kingdom,
Canada, Australia and New Zeeland. The Chinese spokesperson has used strong
language, so one can understand that the Chinese government intends to respond
in a tough way to the external interference in China's internal affairs,
referring to the Five Eyes intelligence-sharing group accusations regarding
the Chinese politics toward Hong-Kong[1].
In
order to do a detailed analysis, we need to present a short history of the Hong-Kong
mass protests against the Chinese government after UK returned that territory
to China, in 1997:
Ø 1
July 2003: 500,000 inhabitants peacefully protest against legislation changes; the
huge number of protesters compel the Chinese government to cancel the changes;
Ø 29
July 2012: tens of thousands of inhabitants peacefully protest against authorities’
attempts to amend the curriculum of the Hong Kong school system; some groups
continue protests in August and September, by occupying areas around government
buildings; the protests compel the Chinese government to cancel the changes;
Ø October-December
2014: 79 days of protests (named Umbrella
Movement) against changes in electoral system; the
actions are well-organized and take place in several areas simultaneously,
involving tens of thousands of people; some core protest groups are noticed; the
Police uses force and succeed to stop the demonstrations; the Chinese government
does not cancel the legislative changes;
Ø 8
February 2016: approximately 300 persons violently protest against the government’s
attempt to crack down on unlicensed food vendors in a city district; Police’
intervention is brutal and motivate some activists to join the protests; a new
movement, which demands Hong-Kong independence, is noticed;
Ø August
2016: thousands of persons peacefully protest near government buildings, demanding
Hong-Kong independence[2];
Ø 6
June 2019: 3,000 persons peacefully protest against legislation changes regarding
extradition between Hong-Kong and mainland China;
Ø 9
June 2019: approximately one million people protest against legislation changes
(the Police estimates 240,000 people; nevertheless, this is a huge number); clashes
between Police and protesters take place;
Ø 12
June: tens of thousands of citizens violently protest and surround a government
building; they clash with the Police forces for a few hours; violent core
protest groups are noticed;
Ø 14
June: ”Mothers’ protest” – 6,000 people; government officials announce that the
legislative changes that are subjects of protests are delayed indefinitely;
Ø 16
June: approximately 2 million people protest, no significant violence;
Ø 21
June: students protest violently, some streets are blocked, the Police main
building is under siege, many policemen are wounded;
Ø 30
June: pro-government demonstrations, attended by a lower number of people, by
comparing with the previous anti-government ones;
Ø 1
July: violent demonstrations, the Legislative Council office is vandalized[3];
Ø 6
July 2019 – January 2020: frequent protests, extremely violent; it is difficult
to assess the whole number of victims and the cost of damages (most of the
sources provide only generalities or some figures for specific days; a general
assessment is avoided); hundred of facilities were destroyed; according to some
sources, 10,000 protesters were arrested and, among them, about 2,500 were
convicted[4].
Ø Lately,
throughout 2020: the restrictions imposed due to SarsCoV-2 pandemic have
significantly diminished the protests, but have not stopped them.
Now, we can do a short
analysis. Hong-Kong protests have caused huge economic losses and have shown
that the Chinese government is not able to keep the control of own territory.
For the Chinese leadership, this is very unpleasant. Chinese Foreign Ministry
threatens some states. In the field of international relationships, the threat
is extremely serious, especially when the strong language is used. Those states
are accused of interference in China's internal affairs, by initiating and
supporting the Hong-Kong protests. What does this mean? China is not able to deal
with domestic threats which are the result of other states’ interference.
Generally speaking, who threatens? The weaker one, which does not have the
abilities and means to mitigate the dangers. If the Chinese government had been
able to neutralize the core protest groups and to convince the majority of
protesters to cease their actions, there would not been threats against other
states. But the Chinese officials use their only weapon: threats against the
states which allegedly initiated and supported the China domestic problems.
Behind the inability of
the Chinese government to counter subversive operations on its own territory,
we can notice the inefficiency of one of the Chinese national security system
components: counterintelligence. 23 years after Hong-Kong was returned to
China, the Chinese special agencies have not been able to gain the control of
that area. One can easily notice this after the long period of violent
protests. This means that the security of China has certain vulnerabilities.
The defensive counterintelligence
field of a nation is, in fact, like a wall, and does not only consist of
counterintelligence agencies. In fact, it is a system. First component of the
system is the intelligence agencies which operate abroad, which can identify threats
that originate in foreign countries. The second component is the border
security agencies that prevent dangerous individuals, who pose threats for
national security, to cross the border and also prevent forbidden stuff to be
smuggled. The counterintelligence agencies, national and local ones, who
identify the subversive groups, monitor and dismantle them, represent only the
third component. The fourth component is
the Local Police forces, which deal with the subversive groups and their
activities. The fifth component is the political leadership, both national and
local, which, based on the information received from the counterintelligence
agencies, conduct administrative activities and make laws that diminish public
dissatisfaction and improve the government relations with the citizens.
How thing work? The
agents who operate abroad identify the preparations for subversive actions on
national territory, or find some clues about this. The government is alerted.
The border Police, which also has some intelligence subunits, prevent the
suspect individuals to enter the country and intercept the illegal transports
of weapons, ammunition, propaganda materials, money and so on. National
counterintelligence agencies identify the subversive groups, figure out their
plans, locate the leaders, intercept their communications, locate their safe
heavens and caches. Lately, the agencies conduct specific operations: make the groups’ members inoffensive (not only
by arresting them, there is a wide range of methods to compromise them), infill
the subversive networks, raid the suspect locations. Local counterintelligence
branches, based on the reports received from the central agency, identify the
local members of the subversive groups and their supporters and find out the
means and methods designed for anti-government actions. They also infill the
protesting groups and compromise them using a wide range of techniques: spreading
rumors, acting contrary to the slogans promoted by the core protest groups,
leading the participants to the places that are not suitable for protests and so on. The Police, using its own
agents who are in contact with the inhabitants, asses the level of public
support for the protests and identify the categories of citizens that join
them. Based on reports received from counterintelligence agencies, Police send
forces to protect the buildings that are targets for protesters and block
certain routes which give advantages to them. Police also arrest members of
violent groups, before joining the protests. Finally, based on the information
received from the Police and from counterintelligence agencies, the government
corrects some administrative aspects and changes the legislation, in order
diminish public dissatisfaction. At the same time, the government conducts
specific actions to influence the people, by sending representatives who are
popular among the locals, organizing press conferences and so on.
As an example of a
successful operation to prevent local protests: the Department of State
Security and Ministry of Interior actions at Iași (Romania), in December 1989. They succeeded to prevent the
anti-government protests organized in 14 December[5].
The Hong-Kong protests
reveal a lot of vulnerabilities of Chinese national security system. The
Chinese leaders have focused on economic expansion and have neglected the
domestic security. The huge imbalance between the economic level and the
national security causes serious problems and can affect the country.
Naturally, we will notice improvements.
[1] Article ‘Five
Eyes’ could be poked blind if China’s sovereignty and security harmed, warns
Chinese FM spokesperson, on-line
publication Global Times, 19 November
2020, on Internet at https://www.globaltimes.cn/content/1207378.shtml.
[2] Article A Brief History of Protest in Post-Handover
Hong Kong, on-line publication Time,
20 June 2019, on Internet at https://time.com/5606212/hong-kong-history-mass-demonstrations-protest/.
[3] Martin Purbrick, article
A Report Of The 2019 Hong Kong Protests,
Asian Affairs publication, 14 October
2019.
[4] Article Arrests And Trials Of Hong Kong
Protesters, on-line
publication Kong Tsung-gan / 江松澗, on Internet at
https://kongtsunggan.medium.com/arrests-and-trials-of-hong-kong-protesters-2019-9d9a601d4950.
[5] Alex Mihai Stoenescu, Istoria loviturilor de stat în România (History of Coup D’etats in Romania), volume 4, part I – ,,Revoluția din decembrie 1989” – o tragedie românească (December 1989 Revolution – A Romanian Tragedy), RAO publishing house, 2012, page 23-62.
Comments
Post a Comment