Skip to main content

 


THE MYTH OF ISRAELI INVINCIBILITY. PART VII


1982 – Intervention in Lebanon

           In the early 1980s, Israel still maintained clear military superiority over its Arab neighbors. Its assets remained the same: consistent US support, highly efficient intelligence services, air power, and 'blitzkrieg' tactics. Technological superiority was not yet evident.

          Israel's security was very solid. With the exception of Syria and Palestinian groups in Lebanon, there were no longer any premises for conflict with neighboring states. In any case, Syria no longer had anywhere near the strength to launch a military campaign against Israel. Iraq and Libya remained enemies, but they lacked the assets to pose a serious threat to the Jewish state. A new enemy had appeared on the horizon—Iran, following the 1979 Islamic Revolution. However, at that time, it presented no direct danger, being both tied up in the reorganization of its society and armed forces, and bogged down in a war of attrition with Iraq.

          The establishment of Palestinian armed groups in Lebanon and the country's civil war resulted in serious threats to Israel along its northern border. The Lebanese government no longer exercised any control over the southern part of the country. The capital, Beirut, was divided into two sectors: East Beirut, controlled by Christian groups, and West Beirut, controlled by the PLO and other Muslim factions[1]. The 1978 intervention did not yield the expected results. Although a UN contingent of over 7,000 troops was deployed in southern Lebanon, and a buffer zone controlled by Christian militias allied with Israel was established directly along Israel's northern border, Palestinian armed groups continued to carry out attacks on Israeli territory.

          Civil war was raging in Lebanon. The intervention of Syrian forces starting in 1976—with over 30,000 troops under an Arab League mandate—yielded modest results, failing to pacify the country. After 1978, Israeli forces carried out targeted airstrikes in southern Lebanon against Palestinian forces. In April 1981, fighting broke out between Christian groups and Syrian forces. Israeli fighter jets carried out support missions for Christian groups, which prompted the Syrian command to deploy SA-6 surface-to-air missile batteries in Lebanon, thereby limiting the Israelis' freedom of action. On July 10, 1981, Palestinian groups launched massive heavy artillery attacks on northern Israel, forcing thousands of civilians to flee south. Israeli airstrikes, including those targeting Beirut, failed to stop the shelling. Through the mediation of US representatives, a ceasefire agreement was reached between Israel and the PLO. This was observed until June 1982. However, following the assassination of an Israeli diplomat in Paris in April 1982, Israeli fighter jets struck PLO targets in Lebanon.[2]

          Let’s look at a chronology of the operations [3]:

June 3, 1982: The Israeli Ambassador to London is seriously injured in an attack carried out by a radical Palestinian group.

June 4, 1982:

-       In retaliation for the attack, the Israeli Air Force carries out strikes on PLO headquarters in Beirut; over 500 casualties.

-       PLO-affiliated armed groups in southern Lebanon attack 23 settlements in northern Israel with artillery fire, including rocket projectiles (launched by the famous Katyushas[4]).

June 5, 1982:

-       The Israeli leadership decides to launch a military campaign in Lebanon; objectives: the elimination of threats posed by Palestinian armed groups (which, at this time, possess over 23,000 fighters, 150 tanks, hundreds of heavy artillery pieces, and hundreds of armored personnel carriers; besides PLO forces, two Palestinian brigades are under Syrian command); the withdrawal of Syrian troops from Lebanon; and the imposition of a government formed by leaders of Christian political groups allied with Israel.

-       An Israeli tank unit enters southern Lebanon, in the area controlled by Christian groups.

June 6, 1982:

-       The Israeli Ground Forces (60,000 troops and 500 tanks) cross the border and launch offensive operations in three directions: northwest toward the city of Tyre, to eliminate Palestinian groups in the area; north toward the Bekaa Valley, to block Syrian force deployments in Lebanon; and northeast toward areas occupied by the Al-Fatah group (the main armed wing of the PLO); fighter jets carry out strikes on targets in the zones toward which the tank and mechanized columns are advancing; Palestinian resistance is insignificant.

-       In certain sectors, UNIFIL subunits attempt to block the access of Israeli troops, only succeeding in delaying their advance.

-       Israeli mechanized units cross the Litani River.

-       An Israeli A-4 Skyhawk fighter jet is shot down by Palestinians with an SA-7 anti-aircraft missile (launched from a man-portable system).

-       Israeli units are air-deployed north of the Zahrani River (50 kilometers north of the border) and establish a bridgehead; Palestinian groups are taken by surprise and offer weak resistance.

June 7 1982:

-       In southeastern Lebanon, Israeli forces focus on searching for and eliminating Palestinian armed detachments; firefights occur with Syrian patrols; Syrian artillery opens fire on Israeli forces.

-       Israeli fighter jets bomb PLO targets in Beirut; Syrian fighter jets attempt to intercept them; a Syrian MiG-23 is shot down;

-       Syrian forces deploy an additional 6 SA-6 anti-aircraft missile batteries in the Bekaa Valley;

-       Israeli troops take control of the city of Tyre (previously controlled by Palestinians) and besiege Sidon.

June 8, 1982:

-       On the north-western axis of advance, Israeli forces manage to seize control of the cities of Sidon and Damur following intense urban combat, reaching 16 km south of Beirut; Palestinian guerrilla units bypassed by the Israeli advance carry out attacks on Israeli supply lines; the Israeli command slows the advance, being forced to redeploy troops to the rear of their formation to neutralize the Palestinian units;

-       On the northern axis of advance, Israeli forces approach the Beirut–Damascus highway, the main supply line for Syrian forces; near the town of Ain Zhalta, they engage Syrian tank and commando units, and the speed of the advance slows;

-       Israeli fighter jets attack Syrian anti-aircraft batteries near the town of Jezzine; subsequently, Israeli mechanized units assault the town and manage to take control of it on the same day; Syrian forces retreat;

-       Combat between Israeli and Syrian tank subunits in the Bekaa Valley.

June 9, 1982:

-       Palestinian and Syrian heavy artillery carry out bombardments on Israeli Ground Forces positions;

-       New Syrian forces, transported from Syria, are deployed to the Bekaa Valley;

-       Israeli F-4 and A-4 squadrons, supported by F-15s and F-16s, carry out two massive strikes on Syrian tank unit positions and anti-aircraft missile batteries; at least 15 batteries are knocked out; Syrian fighter jets intervene; a major air battle ensues, pitting approximately 60 Syrian aircraft against about 50 Israeli ones; over 20 Syrian planes are shot down;

-       Israeli ground units make significant advances along the north-eastern and northern axes;

-       The UN issues two resolutions ordering a ceasefire and the withdrawal of Israeli forces from Lebanon.

June 10, 1982:

-       Most Israeli troops halt their advance along the north-eastern and northern axes and move to consolidate their lines, preparing for Syrian counterattacks;

-       Air combat over Lebanon; 15 Syrian fighter jets are shot down;

-       The Israeli leadership declares a unilateral ceasefire in the central and eastern sectors;

-       Israeli ground units continue their advance toward Beirut;

-       The US President calls for Israel's withdrawal from Lebanon.

June 11, 1982:

-       The air strike campaign against Palestinian targets in Beirut intensifies; Israeli warships join the fire missions;

-       Syria and Israel reach a ceasefire agreement; it does not apply to Palestinian groups;

-       Israeli units advance toward Beirut;

-       Iranian troops are deployed to Syria by air.

June 12, 1982:

-       The Red Cross announces that over 1,500 civilians have been killed in the city of Sidon alone;

-       Israeli representatives announce their own casualties: over 100 dead (including a general) and more than 600 wounded;

-       The Israeli advance toward Beirut continues.

June 13, 1982:

-       Israel and the PLO reach a ceasefire agreement;

-       Israeli units link up with Christian militias east of Beirut; extensive sweep-and-detain operations begin, targeting Palestinians suspected of belonging to armed groups, alongside the seizure of weapons, ammunition, and military equipment;

-       The siege of Beirut begins;

-       Israeli forces seize control of several neighborhoods in southern Beirut.

June 14 – 19, 1982:

-       The Lebanese capital is besieged by land and sea;

-       The Israelis strike areas occupied by Palestinian groups in the city from the sea, from the air, and with ground artillery; combat takes place between Israeli subunits and Palestinian armed groups;

-       Syrian and Palestinian forces attack Israeli forces near Beirut and along other lines in central and eastern Lebanon; the Israelis counterattack, and Syrian forces retreat to the Bekaa Valley;

-       Thousands of civilians flee Beirut.

June 20 – 25, 1982:

-       The siege of Beirut and Israeli land, naval, and air operations against Palestinian armed groups inside the city continue, focusing on the western sector;

-       Israeli forces conduct offensive operations in the western and central areas of Lebanon, succeeding in gaining control over a section of the Beirut–Damascus highway;

-       The US Embassy in Lebanon closes; over 1,000 foreign nationals flee Beirut.

June 26 – July 4, 1982:

-       Israeli troops impose a blockade on the supply of water and food to West Beirut;

-       Fighting continues in Beirut;

-       The UN General Assembly condemns Israel for its refusal to withdraw troops from Lebanon;

-       The Israeli Prime Minister agrees to let PLO members leave Lebanon with their personal weapons.

July 5 – 10, 1982:

-       Combat between Israeli mechanized and tank units and Palestinian forces near the Beirut airport;

-       US representatives announce a plan to deploy 1,000 Marines to ensure the evacuation of PLO members from Beirut; the PLO rejects the plan;

-       The US President announces the intention to send Marines as a peacekeeping force to Lebanon; the USSR leadership warns that it will take measures.

July 11, 1982: The heaviest artillery duels in Beirut since the start of the campaign between Israeli and Palestinian forces; these lasted 15 hours, followed by a ceasefire.

July 13, 1982: The summit of Arab states; a consensus fails to emerge regarding measures against Israel.

July 14, 1982: The Lebanese government proposes its own peace plan, based on the withdrawal of Israeli, Syrian, and PLO forces from Lebanon, but it is not taken into consideration.

July 17, 1982: The Israeli Prime Minister gives the PLO 30 days to leave West Beirut.

July 18, 1982: Palestinian detachments infiltrate the Israeli positions in the Bekaa Valley and carry out attacks, causing casualties among Israeli troops.

July 22, 1982: Israeli fighter jets attack Palestinian targets in Beirut and the Bekaa Valley.

July 23, 1982:

-       Israeli fighter jets and ground artillery attack Palestinian targets in Beirut and the Bekaa Valley;

-       Palestinian detachments carry out raids against Israeli forces in Sidon and on the Beirut–Damascus highway.

July 24, 1982: An Israeli fighter jet is shot down by a Syrian anti-aircraft missile battery.

July 26, 1982: Israeli fighter jets bomb Palestinian targets in Beirut.

July 27, 1982: Israeli artillery hits Palestinian targets in central Beirut.

July 28, 1982: Israeli bombings of Beirut cease following the conclusion of a ceasefire.

July 29, 1982: PLO representatives announce to the Arab League that they agree to the organization leaving Lebanon.

August 15, 1982: An agreement is reached between all parties regarding the evacuation of Palestinian fighters from Beirut; it begins immediately, by sea.

August 23, 1982: A Christian leader wins the presidential election in Lebanon.

August 25, 1982: An international contingent, consisting of 800 US Marines, 570 French paratroopers, and 1,200 Italian infantrymen, lands in Beirut to ensure the evacuation of PLO forces.

August 31, 1982: The main Palestinian armed groups (approximately 11,000 fighters) complete their withdrawal from Lebanon.

September 1, 1982: The Israeli Defense Minister announces the end of military operations in Lebanon.

September 4, 1982: 8 Israeli soldiers are kidnapped in Lebanon.

September 10, 1982: The multinational contingent deployed in Beirut to ensure the PLO evacuation is withdrawn.

September 13, 1982: The Christian leader who won the presidential election is assassinated; serious unrest breaks out across the country.

September 13 – 15, 1982: The Israeli leadership revises the operational plans following the resulting unrest.

September 16 – 18, 1982: Israeli forces take control of West Beirut.

September 19 – 28, 1982: Following massacres committed by Christian militias against Palestinian civilians, international pressure mounts on Israel to withdraw from Beirut; Israeli forces begin their withdrawal from the Lebanese capital.

September 29, 1982:

-       Israeli forces complete their withdrawal from Beirut but continue to control southern Lebanon;

-       An international contingent, consisting of 2,400 US Marines and 1,200 Italian paratroopers, is deployed to Beirut; they will later be joined by French and British units, and will initiate the process of rebuilding the Lebanese army.

September 1982 – September 1983: Numerous guerrilla warfare actions take place against Israeli forces, carried out mainly by Shiite armed groups; Israeli forces average 10 deaths per month. Internal political pressure on Israeli leaders to withdraw from Lebanon intensifies; in Israel, massive protests erupt against the military presence in Lebanon. Disputes arise between high-ranking military officers and Israeli politicians, alongside protest movements within the reservist ranks.

November 11, 1982: Following an attack in the city of Tyre, carried out by a Shiite group, 75 Israeli soldiers and special agents lose their lives.

November 23, 1982: Six of the eight Israeli soldiers kidnapped on Sept. 4 are released by a PLO-affiliated group in exchange for 4,700 Palestinian prisoners.

April 18, 1983: Car bomb attack at the US Embassy in Beirut; 67 dead.

1983 – July 1984: Various Lebanese paramilitary groups and Syrian military units carry out numerous attacks on the multinational contingent, which retaliates.

May 17, 1983: Attempted agreement between Lebanon, Israel, and Syria on the withdrawal of Syrian and Israeli forces; Syria objects.

September 3, 1983: Israeli forces withdraw south of the Awali River (approximately 60 km north of the border).

October 23, 1983: A suicide truck bomb attack on the US Embassy in Beirut kills 241 American servicemen; another suicide attack on the French forces' headquarters kills 58 French soldiers.

November 4, 1983: An attack on an Israeli base in Tyre, carried out by a Shiite armed group (a precursor to Hezbollah); 28 soldiers and special agents killed, another 40 wounded.

November 1983: Israeli fighter jets attack Syrian targets in the Bekaa Valley; an Israeli Mirage is shot down in Beirut.

December 4, 1983: Following Syrian fire directed at US reconnaissance aircraft, the US Navy carries out a raid with 29 fighter jets on Syrian army positions east of Beirut; two aircraft from the strike formation are shot down. On the same day, Syrian forces launch artillery fire at US Marine positions near the Beirut airport, resulting in 8 deaths among them; the US Navy retaliates with naval gunfire.

1983 – 1985: Numerous refusals to fight in Lebanon are reported among Israeli military personnel, especially among reservists.

1984: The pro-Iranian Shiite armed group Hezbollah is established.

February - July 1984: The multinational forces are withdrawn from Lebanon.

February  - April 1985: Israeli forces withdraw to the security zone in southern Lebanon (a strip 10–20 km wide), controlled by the South Lebanon Army (a Christian militia) funded by Israel.

1985 – 1990: Shiite armed groups, primarily Hezbollah, carry out artillery attacks on the security zone and northern Israel.

1990: The Lebanese Civil War ends; however, the Lebanese government fails to gain control over the southern part of the country.

1990 – 2000: Attacks by armed groups, especially Shiite ones, continue against Israeli forces in southern Lebanon and against northern Israel.

July 1993: Operation Accountability: in response to Hezbollah artillery shelling of northern Israel, Israeli forces retaliate with a six-day campaign of airstrikes and heavy artillery fire against Hezbollah targets in southern Lebanon.

April 1996: Israeli forces carry out Operation Grapes of Wrath; in response to Hezbollah artillery shelling of Israeli troops in southern Lebanon, the Israeli command orders a 14-day campaign of airstrikes, heavy artillery fire, and naval bombardment against the group's targets.

May 25, 2000: Israeli forces withdraw completely from Lebanon. Hezbollah takes control of the southern part of the country.

Israeli casualties between June 1982 and May 2000 were 1,215 dead (540 from June to September 1982, and 675 from September 1982 to May 2000) and 3,887 wounded [5]. Approximately 10,000 members of Palestinian armed groups and Syrian soldiers were killed. The number of civilians is difficult to estimate, but it is in the tens of thousands.[6]

    The analysis of the campaign reveals very interesting details. Regarding the superiority of the Israeli armed forces over their adversaries, there is no longer any doubt. First and foremost is the technological superiority, particularly in the fields of combat aviation and electronic warfare. The main advantage was air dominance. Israeli fighter jets cleared the way for ground forces and struck deep-seated targets. Effectively, the Lebanese skies were dominated by the Israelis, a feat ensured by the presence of modern F-15 and F-16 aircraft. At sea, Israeli warships also enjoyed total freedom of action. Notably, the Israelis made extensive use of drones for intelligence gathering, including during the period leading up to the campaign[7].

          The Israeli Air Force was opposed by Syrian fighter jets and Syrian anti-aircraft missile batteries. To maintain air dominance, Israeli pilots had to confront them, which they did successfully. However, they had been preparing for this for a long time—since 1973. Following that war, they drew many conclusions. One of them was the necessity of finding solutions to neutralize mobile anti-aircraft missile batteries. To this end, the Air Force Command was equipped with a computerized command and control system as early as 1974. Fighter jets were outfitted with modern anti-radiation missiles (AGM-78).

          On June 9, 1982, the Israeli Air Force carried out a well-planned and coordinated attack against the Syrian SA-6 anti-aircraft missile batteries in the Bekaa Valley. To do this, they directed a large number of drones toward the area where the Syrian air defense batteries were located. These drones launched missiles, leading the Syrian military to believe they were being attacked by fighter jets. The drones were, of course, shot down, but the batteries exposed their positions. Immediately, anti-radiation missiles were launched from the ground and by 20 F-4 aircraft against the batteries' detection and guidance systems, as well as the Syrian radar units deployed in the area. A second wave of F-4s followed, attacking the launch installations. The Syrian reaction was chaotic; they launched missiles but without success. The operation was supported by an E-2 Hawkeye airborne early warning and control aircraft, a Boeing-707 equipped for electronic warfare, and approximately 50 F-15 and F-16 fighter jets. The Syrian command scrambled about 60 MiG-21 and MiG-23 fighters to engage the Israeli planes. In the ensuing battle, over 20 Syrian aircraft were shot down (sources provide different figures—23, 26, or 29 planes downed), while the Israelis suffered no losses[8]. It was to be expected, as they held every advantage. The F-15 was an air superiority fighter specifically engineered with technical and tactical specifications that guaranteed success against Syrian MiGs. Its radar system was capable of detecting hostile aircraft at a range of 170 km[9]. The most advanced Syrian fighter jet, the MiG-23, had a radar with a maximum range of 70 km[10]. Most critically, Syrian air-to-ground communications and onboard radar systems were compromised by electronic warfare countermeasures. Conversely, Israeli aircraft operated under precise coordination, maintaining a continuous and clear tactical air picture. Syrian onboard radars became inoperable once they closed within 10–15 km of Israeli flight formations. In total, Syrian forces lost more than 80 MiG-21 and MiG-23 fighters during the campaign, whereas Israeli losses amounted to 13 airframes: 1 F-16, 1 F-4, 1 Mirage, 2 A-4s, and 8 helicopters. One question remains unresolved: despite having MiG-25 interceptors in its inventory, the Syrian Air Force failed to deploy them in combat. They merely performed reconnaissance flights over Lebanon, avoiding any engagement with Israeli planes.[11] That remains a subject for a future piece.

          Air power and technological superiority ensured Israel's success on the battlefield. This is an undeniable fact. However, in this conflict, new elements emerged that the Israeli forces had never encountered before.

For a better understanding, we can divide the entire period of the conflict into three distinct parts, and we will find that each presents different characteristics. The three periods are: 1. June 4–13, 1982; 2. June 14 – September 29, 1982; 3. September 30, 1982 – May 2000.

          The first period is characterized by undeniable Israeli military successes, achieved through the combined use of well-known strengths: air dominance, technological superiority, and 'blitzkrieg' tactics. These actions were based on detailed intelligence regarding Palestinian groups and Syrian forces. Their adversaries stood no chance. There was also another factor: the local population in southern Lebanon welcomed the Israeli military as liberators[12]. However, the primary objective of the campaign—the elimination of Palestinian armed groups—was not achieved, which will generate consequences in the short and medium term.

          The second period was a transition from 'blitzkrieg' actions to a war of attrition. Although Israeli forces managed to achieve certain objectives (most importantly, the PLO left Lebanon), the threats were not eliminated. Many hostile groups remained in Lebanon, and Syrian forces were not withdrawn despite the losses they sustained.

          The third phase is defined by attrition warfare, a scenario for which the IDF was ill-prepared. Iran-backed Shiite militant groups expanded their reach significantly, launching intensive operations against Israeli positions. The strategic advantage of 'blitzkrieg' tactics, so effective in previous campaigns, was rendered obsolete. While air superiority was maintained, it proved ineffective against small, highly mobile units that generally avoided open engagement. Modern electronic warfare assets faced similar limitation. The intelligence services remained a strategic asset, yet the unfolding events reveal a lack of significant outcomes. This shift was expected, given that the local populace, which had greeted Israeli troops with enthusiasm in June 1982, became hostile within a year. The reasons behind this can only be truly explained by those who were present and actively involved. This is the Middle East, a realm entirely distinct from Europe. Western logic simply does not apply there. Effectively, Israel became mired in an attritional conflict that transformed into a nightmare.

       Of the total Israeli casualties, approximately 20% were the result of friendly fire[13]. This figure is quite significant, yet it stems from objective causes. The Israeli military lacked extensive experience in urban combat, with their last major urban offensive taking place in Jerusalem in 1967. Beyond that, Israeli troops had only engaged small, disorganized, and ill-equipped Palestinian factions in the urban and peri-urban areas of the West Bank. In Lebanon, however, they faced a far more formidable resistance. This was a novel challenge for which they were unable to adapt.

Another issue arising from the war of attrition manifested within Israeli society. Up to that point, the military establishment had benefited from robust public support, which was expected given the constant threats to the nation's security. By 1982, however, these threats had largely subsided, with the exception of tensions on the northern border. While the initial invasion of Lebanon in June 1982 received public backing, support eroded rapidly once the operation devolved into a war of attrition. The majority of the population was unwilling to accept a protracted conflict involving steady losses. Modern life, defined by comfort and affluence, proved incompatible with sustained warfare. Reservists were deployed to Lebanon during their reserve duty periods, triggering significant resentment. Political leaders attempted to conceal the casualty figures, but to no avail. Extensive demonstrations were staged in opposition to the Lebanese campaign. Internal frictions emerged within the military institution, alongside disputes between senior military officers and political leadership. Furthermore, there was a decline in voluntary enlistment for active duty within the IDF. This marked a significant shift, as military service had hitherto been viewed as a prestigious obligation. The most critical issue was the diminishing number of career officers, which carried profound medium- and long-term implications.[14] This war of attrition caused a phenomenon entirely unprecedented for the Israeli armed forces: the erosion of morale.

In its short military history, Israel had already participated in an armed conflict known as the 'War of Attrition' (1967–1970, on the Suez Canal, in the Sinai Peninsula, and in the Mediterranean—presented in a previous chapter). However, in that conflict, not many troops were involved; the actions were predominantly aerial, losses were minor, and successes were achieved. Therefore, the impact on the armed forces and society in general was positive.

Aside from the complications of the protracted conflict, Israel was undergoing a natural and gradual erosion of a significant trump card. The founding generations of the Jewish state no longer constituted the majority. Many had perished, while the survivors were aged and represented a shrinking demographic. These were resilient generations—survivors of concentration camps and the atrocities of the Second World War—who had arrived as penniless refugees and embraced a life of austerity within the kibbutz movement. Historically, such backgrounds produce superior military personnel, tempered by hardship and constant peril. For them, luxury was non-existent. It was these generations that achieved the military triumphs of Israel's early years, supported by the strategic factors previously discussed. In contrast, younger generations sought to avoid conflict, aspiring instead to a secure and affluent existence. This generational shift resulted in the diminishing military proficiency of the state.

 


         

       



[1] Multinational Force web site, Beirut, 1982 to 1984, section Timeline, accessed March 10, 2026, https://multinationalforcebeirut.com/multi-national-force-beirut-casualties-1982-to-1984/multi-national-force-beirut-1982-to-1984-timeline/.

[2] “Israel Strikes at The P.L.O.”, Time, accessed March 10, 2026, https://time.com/archive/6859329/israel-strikes-at-the-p-l-o/?utm_source=chatgpt.com; “Operation Peace for the Galilee: The First Lebanon War”, Israeli Defense Forces (IDF) web site, accessed March 10, 2026, https://www.idf.il/en/articles/2022/operation-peace-for-the-galilee-the-first-lebanon-war/?utm_source=chatgpt.com; “First Lebanon War”, Wars and Operations, accessed March 10, 2026, https://www.idf.il/en/mini-sites/wars-and-operations/first-lebanon-war/?utm_source=chatgpt.com.

[3] “Israel Strikes at The P.L.O.”, Time, accessed March 10, 2026, https://time.com/archive/6859329/israel-strikes-at-the-p-l-o/?utm_source=chatgpt.com; “Operation Peace for the Galilee: The First Lebanon War”, Israeli Defense Forces (IDF) web site, accessed March 10, 2026, https://www.idf.il/en/articles/2022/operation-peace-for-the-galilee-the-first-lebanon-war/?utm_source=chatgpt.com; “First Lebanon War”, Wars and Operations, accessed March 10, 2026, https://www.idf.il/en/mini-sites/wars-and-operations/first-lebanon-war/?utm_source=chatgpt.com; “A chronology of events relating to Israel's invasion of Lebanon”, UPI, accessed March 10, 2026, https://www.upi.com/Archives/1982/07/30/A-chronology-of-events-relating-to-Israels-invasion-of/2454396849600/?utm_source=chatgpt.com6; “Israel has invaded Lebanon six times in the past 50 years – a timeline of events”, The Deeping, accessed March 10, 2026, https://www.thedeeping.eu/2024/10/07/israel-has-invaded-lebanon-six-times-in-the-past-50-years-a-timeline-of-events/?utm_source=chatgpt.com; “The “Quagmire” Then and Now: Lessons for Combat in the Gaza Strip and for Decision Making from the IDF’s Presence in Lebanon Until its Withdrawal to the Awali in October 1983”, The Institute for National Security Studies, accessed March 10, 2026, https://www.inss.org.il/publication/1983-2024/#_edn6; Multinational Force web site, Beirut, 1982 to 1984, section Timeline, accessed March 10, 2026, https://multinationalforcebeirut.com/multi-national-force-beirut-casualties-1982-to-1984/multi-national-force-beirut-1982-to-1984-timeline/; “Operation Accountability”, Wars and Operations, accessed March 10, 2026, https://www.idf.il/en/mini-sites/wars-and-operations/operation-accountability/?utm_source=chatgpt.com; “Operation Grapes of Wrath (1996)”, Y.net, accessed March 10, 2026, https://www.ynet.co.il/articles/0%2C7340%2CL-3284744%2C00.html?utm_source=chatgpt.com; “The Integration of Operations and Intelligence. Getting Information to the Warfighter”, Air Command and Staff College, accessed March 11, 2026, https://irp.fas.org/eprint/97-0362.pdf?utm_source=chatgpt.com; “How Israeli F-15s and F-16s Decimated the Syrian Air Force 88-13”, The National Interest, accessed March 11, 2026, https://nationalinterest.org/blog/buzz/how-israeli-f-15s-and-f-16s-decimated-syrian-air-force-88-13-73851?utm_source=chatgpt.com.

 [4] BM-13 multiple rocket launcher, produced in the USSR.

[5] Multinational Force web site, Beirut, 1982 to 1984, section Timeline, accessed March 10, 2026, https://multinationalforcebeirut.com/multi-national-force-beirut-casualties-1982-to-1984/multi-national-force-beirut-1982-to-1984-timeline/; “The “Quagmire” Then and Now: Lessons for Combat in the Gaza Strip and for Decision Making from the IDF’s Presence in Lebanon Until its Withdrawal to the Awali in October 1983”, The Institute for National Security Studies, accessed March 11, 2026, https://www.inss.org.il/publication/1983-2024/#_edn6.

[6] “New figures emerge on the cost in lives of Israel's war in Lebanon”, The Christians Science Monitor, accessed March 11, 2026, https://www.csmonitor.com/1982/1221/122162.html?utm_source=chatgpt.com.

[7] “How Israeli F-15s and F-16s Decimated the Syrian Air Force 88-13”, The National Interest, accessed March 11, 2026, https://nationalinterest.org/blog/buzz/how-israeli-f-15s-and-f-16s-decimated-syrian-air-force-88-13-73851?utm_source=chatgpt.com.

[8] “Israel Strikes at The P.L.O.”, Time, accessed March 12, https://time.com/archive/6859329/israel-strikes-at-the-p-l-o/?utm_source=chatgpt.com; “Revolution in military affairs - The operation Mole Cricket 19 as a case study for the technological race during the cold war”, Sage Journals, accessed March 12, 2026, https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/22338659221075806.

[10] “Mikoyan MIG-23”, WarGistory.org,”, accessed March 12, 2026, https://warhistory.org/%40msw/article/mikoyan-mig-23?utm_source=chatgpt.com.

[11] “F-15s Attack!: Israel Shot Down 88 Syrian Fighter Jets in this Famous Battle”, The National Interest, accessed March 12, 2026, https://nationalinterest.org/blog/buzz/f-15s-attack-israel-shot-down-88-syrian-fighter-jets-famous-battle-69816?utm_source=chatgpt.com&utm_source=chatgpt.com.

[12] “The “Quagmire” Then and Now: Lessons for Combat in the Gaza Strip and for Decision Making from the IDF’s Presence in Lebanon Until its Withdrawal to the Awali in October 1983”,The Institute for National Security Studies, accessed March 13, 2026, https://www.inss.org.il/publication/1983-2024/#_edn6.

[13] Ibid.

[14] Ibid.


Comments

Popular posts from this blog

  THE MYTH OF ISRAELI INVINCIBILITY. PART II 1956 – Suez Crisis            Crisis erupted due to the nationalization of the Suez Canal. In 1954, the Egyptian president, Gamal Abdul Nasser, started ambitious projects, including Aswan Dam (on Nile) and armed forces modernization. Initially, he asked USA and UK for funding but was refused. Taking advantage of the rivalry between Eastern and Western blocs, he approached the USSR for help and received a positive answer. Based on Soviet security guarantees, he took a step forward: on 26 July 1956, he nationalized Suez Canal, owned by an Anglo-French company. Due to the highly geostrategic and economic importance of the canal, UK and France reacted. Their first approach, supported by the USA, was a diplomatic one but later, planned a military intervention to seize the canal by force. Israel was included in this plan. According to it, the Israeli forces were supposed to conduct offensive operations in Sinai Pe...
  KHARG ISLAND – MISSION IMPOSSIBLE?           The international media is flooded with information regarding the US leadership's intention to perform a military operation to occupy Kharg Island in the Persian Gulf. It is believed that seizing the island, which is Iran's primary oil hub, would deal a powerful blow to the Tehran regime. However, such an operation involves an assault and the occupation of the island by an expeditionary force. In other words, boots on the ground . [1]           Kharg Island is located 483 km from the Strait of Hormuz and 25 km from the Iranian coast. The shortest distance to the Saudi coast is approximately 190 km, as is the distance to the Kuwaiti coast. The island's surface area is about 20 km² . Source: https://www.britannica.com/place/Kharg-Island             A simple consultation of the map and a minimal knowledge of the situation show us ...
  THE MYTH OF ISRAELI INVINCIBILITY. PART VI 1978 – Intervention in Lebanon              In 1973, after the Yom Kippur War, Israel already possessed clear military superiority over its Arab neighbors. The defeat suffered and the heavy losses within the Arab coalition guaranteed this reality. The superiority was reflected in the trump cards it consistently held or had regained: strong US support, highly effective intelligence services, air power, and the tactics of (blitzkrieg). Technological superiority was not yet evident.         Israel’s security was already very solid compared to the 1950s and 1960s. Peace negotiations were underway with Egypt. Jordan no longer posed a problem. Syria remained the only neighboring state enemy, but it was far from having the capacity to launch any military campaign against Israel. Other enemies still existed—namely Iraq and Libya—but they were not in a position to act directly. What remained ...